Gregg Carlstrom’s article,
Political clash over Egypt's constitution is talking about Egyptians in the
process of voting on their constitution. Carlstrom states that Egypt is divided
over what should be in the constitution such as, “the balance of powers, the
role of the judiciary, and other key issues.” Much like the Federalists and Anti-Federalists the
disagreement is heated and of crucial importance to the country.
There are groups like the
Federalist and Anti-Federalists who oppose to each other’s point of views
drastically. The debates can get heated and their discordance brings the
process to a hold. Egyp’s Liberals are fighting for amendments for “women’s
rights and role of religion in the state.” Their rivals the Salafists, fight
for the contrary that “the draft grants too many personal freedoms and fails to
protect traditional social mores.” The Muslim Brotherhood, according to the
article, asks the members not to preoccupy with cultural issues, and to focus
on social justice and expanding rights. There is also an alienated Christian
minority, who fight for freedom of religion and other human rights.
The opponent groups are as divided
as they can be, and the conflicts tend to become violent. According to Carlstrom
protests against the Constitution such as the Liberal’s in Tahrir, can turn
into a battle.
No comments:
Post a Comment